Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | su8898's comments login

A few months ago, I stopped reading random news and decided to stick only to Hacker News. But now, even Hacker News is filled with random content. I guess there's no escaping the news these days.


Talking about armed brinksmanship between two nuclear powers is sooooo random, maybe a more specialized community like they have on Reddit is more your speed?


Thanks for the judgment, but I think you might have missed the point I was making.


What point are you trying to make? HN has always had threads about major events and two nuclear powers fighting is a major event.


If you can’t take the news, get out of the aggregator.


You could use this filter to remove politics from HN: https://histre.com/hn/?tags=+all-politics

( d: I made it; ref: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35904988 )


I logged odd Twitter and can only access it through an eink device. I am much saner now.

I really enjoy reading the community here chime in on current events, but I also lament that I can't shield my online consumption from the news.


HN is the easiest place to skip the content you are not interest in


Of course, but the problem is not that I am not interested, it's the contrary I am instinctively attracted to it!

If it was lack of interest I wouldn't need to place so much friction between me and Twitter.


It'll show up on your doorstep before too long, keep it up.


hackernews is very biased


Developers always had the flexibility to create custom UI elements/colors etc even in native apps (albeit not as easily as using CSS). Even in SPAs, most UI elements follow the same style or pattern more or less (bootstrap/tailwind etc). It's the entire UI design itself that's not user friendly for enterprise/business apps (excessive padding, comically large UI elements etc).


This is a rather simplistic view of life IMHO. What’s wrong with people working for rent or groceries? What do you expect everyone to work on?


> What’s wrong with people working for rent or groceries?

There's nothing wrong with people who have the ability to work for groceries being compelled to work for groceries. The rent issue is complicated by the fact that land ownership prioritizes those who have already had time to accumulate wealth over those who have not. There are some issues with abandoning prices on land entirely (e.g. if land has no cost, how do we decide who gets to live in the most desirable locations?), but there's a compelling case to be made that the contemporary system of real estate financialization is similar to the enclosure movement both in terms of its structure and impact. It becomes a question of those with good credit (typically the rich and old) being able to (in aggregate) buy up all of the desirable land and thus to set monthly claims on the income of those with bad credit over and above the level of claim that would be possible if the property purchases could not be financed by loans.

There is a legitimate cost to constructing a building and renting it out, but there is no real cost to land except the cost the market assigns to it. This might not be the worst thing (recall our example of allocating land in desirable locations), but when prospective landlords can take out loans against the property, the property's value is driven up beyond what any reasonable person would be willing to pay for the property's use. If you couldn't derive rental income from property, it would not make economical sense to finance these purchases beyond what you needed for your own use. This would (in theory) lead to lower prices.

Henry George is the figure to look at here.


> What’s wrong with people working for rent or groceries?

Many people are compelled to do that, but almost everyone wants more out of life. Strong evidence is that they take more whenever they can get it.


If you could get whatever you want out of life, right now, with no effort, what would you want exactly?


I'd travel the world, taking in diverse centers of culture, history, and nature. I'd try to learn new languages. I'd do more track days, karting, and Ultimate. I'd buy a shell and try to get back into rowing. I'd play more computer games. I'd play ping-pong, foosball, and board games with my kids. I'd coach kids' sports. I'd go to more plays and concerts. Even movies. I'd volunteer.

Of course I wouldn't do ALL of that, since even without work there are only so many hours in the day. But I certainly wouldn't want for things to do!


Some people do all that and still work, you probably just need better time management. You could study a language before work in the morning, and then go row for a bit. Then go to work. Then you could play computer games from 5 to 6, play ping pong with kids from 6 to 6:30, eat a dinner, coach kids soccer from 7 to 8, volunteer open source from 8:30 to 9:30, catch a movie at 10.


If you're wealthy and healthy, and even so only some of that timeline _may_ be possible, most just unrealistic.

>You could study a language before work in the morning, and then go row for a bit.

Ok, gotta be in by 9am, 30-60 minutes commute, 30 minutes learning a language, gotta eat, shower, coffee, get my row boat mounted and at the lake 20 minutes away, prep, do a 20 minute row, back again so realistically you'd need to be up at 6am, not unreasonable.

> Then go to work. Then you could play computer games from 5 to 6

Did you end work at 4pm or work from home, either way that is likely a short day but ok. A lot of people are forced to have commutes or work in a job that can't be remote, not to mention work much longer days. Hell isn't "60 hours is the sweet spot" for a work week now? (quoting Google's founder recent comments).

> play ping pong with kids from 6 to 6:30,

Have enough room to have a ping pong table at home, that must be nice, but yeah doable.

> eat a dinner, coach kids soccer from 7 to 8,

Who cooked dinner? Who cleaned up? That shit doesn't just happen by itself. So you prepped, cooked, ate and cleaned up, wrangled kids into car for soccer, and got the game field ready to play all in 30 minutes? Nope.

> volunteer open source from 8:30 to 9:30,

Game ended on time, kids didn't hang around to talk to team mates, straight in the car, no issues, and less than 30 minutes transport. Nope.

> catch a movie at 10.

30 minutes to get kids to bed, baby sitter on time (and you can afford one), doable at some ages sure. Movies are regularly 90-180 minutes so you're in bed at like 1am? For a 6am start? Again transport not taken into account.

The reason people think you can work 60 hours a week, every week, is because they don't do all the everyday things that need to get done, they have other people to do it. Also rarely do they leave enough gaps in their schedule for other peoples priorities.


Assume you WFH, 9 to 5. Commute time is zero. You have a middle class suburban house with a lake in the back. Your partner is a stay at home parent, does not work, just does household tasks and takes care of kids.

You wake up at 7. Quick 15 minute breakfast then push your kayak out to the lake and row 45 minutes on the water.

From 8 to 9, you can study a foreign language (same duration as a university course)

At 5 you can game for an hour and decompress. Then ping pong at 6.

By the time you finish ping pong with kids at 6:30, you’ve spent 90 minutes just playing around. Time for dinner, prepared by your partner. Kids have 25 minutes to get dress for soccer and eat dinner. The soccer field should be no more than 5 minute drive from your home.

After the game ends at 8:30, you could schedule an additional 20 minutes for your children’s frivolity if you like. Once you drive home you can cut down to 30 minutes working on open source stuff. A small sacrifice for their joy.

Send kids to their rooms by 9:30. Let them sleep whenever they feel like as long as they are quiet and in their room. Spend time with your partner and prepare yourselves for the night out.

By 9:45 the baby sitter arrives and you two head out for the movies. A baby sitter can be very cheap if your kids are older, often they are just a high school student doing homework or watching TV while your kids sleep or play. Don’t need a PHD.

You could be home by 1 AM depending on movie length. 6 hours of sleep is good enough, you can do it all again the next day.

It’s very doable, especially if you decide you don’t actually want to follow the same schedule everyday.


This schedule, even as a theory, assumes you work from home and have a partner who does not work and a babysitter? I don't actually know what percent of families that describes, but my guess is it's pretty low


Okay but at some point you have to make choices to work toward the life you want, it’s not just going to happen by accident with you chasing whatever you can, and that’s what people don’t understand.

If you want this schedule, prioritize a WFH career and find a partner who wants to stay home and earn enough money to hire a babysitter. If you don’t then this won’t be available to you and it’s your own fault.


So simple! Just as easy to do it as saying it right?


Exactly, saying it’s the easy part.

But even without a job, you still need energy and motivation. The tax of switching between tasks (or hobbies) doesn’t magically disappear. Neither does the time suck of social media.


It is really besides the point because of the way the dopaminergic system works.

What was good enough yesterday is expected today and won't be good enough tomorrow.

That is practically what makes us human.

Whatever you get today with no effort won't be enough tomorrow.

The ideal modern life is really one that is challenging enough that you don't get everything at once but not too hard that you can't make progress.


> with no effort

I want effort, lot's of it, but let's not nitpick ...

Off the top of my head: Nobel Prize winning, world-beneficial research; lots of loving, open, deeply connected relationships; grow rapidly; be someone people turn to for support (because I help them), ...

I already do at least one of those things. :)


I think if you let your imagination wander and you end up seeing the scale of potential we have and what we could really achieve, stuff like paying for rent and groceries starts to feel archaic and wasteful, or as some kind of artificial constraint holding us back as a species.


> What’s wrong with people working for rent or groceries?

Why should people have to work to be able to afford rent and groceries?

Poverty is difficult enough to escape--not having to worry about rent and groceries would sure help.

There is a reason why school meal programs are such a success.


Well, even if we agree that's the best we can aim for as a species (how sad), soon we won't even have that luxury.


Not sure if you’ve intentionally omitted it but I would also include YouTube in this list. YouTube can be very addictive with all the clickbait thumbnails etc.


> Not sure if you’ve intentionally omitted it but I would also include YouTube in this list

Yeah I did conciously omit it actually, but only because I consider Youtube to be basic internet infrastructure and quite valuable if used right.

However, for me personally, I've actually blocked Youtube from Chrome when not in incognito mode to keep me signed out by default and I've also completely blocked the site from my iPad (and ofc I also don't have the app installed).

I unfortunately struggle with some form of social media addiction and I've made pretty dramatic changes to keep myself away from these sites.


haha yeah that's where you inject custom CSS on the page to hide thumbnails, come to YouTube to see something? no thumbnails to distract your original intent


do you have a link to instructions on how to do that? It sounds really nice.


by chrome extension, chrome extensions are pretty straight forward to build but yeah, you just inject a CSS file that hides what you want

you don't have to release the extension, you just load it unpackaged by developer mode in the extensions settings


In refining 0x4CE9EC : 0xDA94D1 (Le Mars) in 01h 14m 32s 457ms I have brought glory to the company. Praise Kier. 5⃣4⃣3⃣6⃣0⃣ 1⃣0⃣9⃣0⃣3⃣ 3⃣1⃣9⃣1⃣6⃣ 2⃣9⃣7⃣3⃣9⃣ 9⃣9⃣8⃣7⃣7⃣ #mdrlumon #severance lumon-industries.com


“I-I love you.”


In my experience, it's worth keeping source files as small as possible. Windsurf regularly has problems with files that are larger than 300 lines, especially if they are not JS/TS files.


Glad to see Alpine mentioned here! Hope it gets more adoption.


Not sure if it's just me but I kind of feel like these components are not very polished - at least not to the point of Bootstrap/AntDesign. May be it's the square unrounded borders or may be it's just the way the demo components are presented.


Cool landing page! Interestingly, I don't see any type of navigation menu (such as a hamburger menu) in the mobile page. Any particular design reason why you opted for that?


My problem is quite the opposite. I am able to finish a side project but I lack ideas.


Please write down any ideas you may have, at any time. It's rare that an idea will come the moment you sit down with a blank screen staring at you.

I've talking to emailing myself with a specific subject every time I have an idea. Doesn't matter how silly it is. I'll revisit them in a month and sift through. Some still remain silly, some will be upgraded given new knowledge.


I felt like this for a long time, then I started to open my eyes to all the problems around me. For example, I started github.com/rmpr/atbswp because I used something like that on Windows, and when I switched to Linux I missed it, on simple solution was to start working on something similar...


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: