Yeah, looking at a map, it looks pretty vanilla and I'm not sure why it had such a notorious reputation at this point. If I recall, I think the original was a cloverleaf design, so in every direction you had people merging on and off in a span of about 300 feet.
Ah, yeah. It was renovated in 2007. [1] An LA Times article on its reputation is here. [2]
> And there are plenty of accidents. Sgt. Morrison of the California Highway Patrol estimates that his officers respond to about 30 calls a day in and around the interchange. They handle fender-benders, stalled cars and the occasional 20-car pileup.
That said, either way, it is pretty vanilla compared to the legit spaghetti mentioned in the article with regard to the Sydney interchange.
Ah, yeah. It was renovated in 2007. [1] An LA Times article on its reputation is here. [2]
> And there are plenty of accidents. Sgt. Morrison of the California Highway Patrol estimates that his officers respond to about 30 calls a day in and around the interchange. They handle fender-benders, stalled cars and the occasional 20-car pileup.
That said, either way, it is pretty vanilla compared to the legit spaghetti mentioned in the article with regard to the Sydney interchange.
[1] https://www.caltrop.com/project-details/sr60-sr91-i215-inter...
[2] https://www.latimes.com/local/la-me-freeway21sep21-story.htm...