Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I don't know if this is 100% a hit piece if so many people really did resign citing emad as the main problem. If he is a compulsive liar or as incompetent as his co-workers claim then it's a red flag to me.

I remember the one time talked about how he could scrape data behind paywalls and about deliberately bypassing anti-scraping techniques on Twitter. I don't think it was a very good PR move.

In the back of my mind I always had this thought that Stability could be some kind of AI accelerationist fund - hype up a shining future, raise enough capital to clear the bar for model training, release their model unencumbered and gather a fervent following of gracious users, and... not have a fully realized plan for what comes after.

But I have a feeling that even if they go under people will still be talking about Stability and their influence on generative art for a long while, at least until another freely available model can oust Stable Diffusion.



That was just the hate mob attacking

I noted that the most interesting data is behind firewalls as in private data as our entire model is open models to private data => not using that data to train our models

You can also license that data smartly, with royalty schemes and more, three no reason to get past paywalls etc nor do we do so (others do of course)

We are the only AI company to even offer opt outs, first models soon on that




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: