Through mere existence, one is increasing entropy.
It's up to a person/organization what they do with resulting energy - pursue actions that cause accelerated destruction or else.
That's original sin! I don't believe in that (as I said above!). Humans are a blessing to this place, not a curse.
My existence is not a problem. But if you think that, follow it through as a line of reasoning. You will live in a world of self-hate, with the ultimate solution being to take your own and others lives. It is an anti-life position.
I personally don't agree with that position. But I do see signs of this sort of 'death-cult' thinking all around me! Its well promoted in the MSM.
It is, when your benchmark is permanence and immortality. If you change the benchmark, to something that is adopted to the nature of man, then the original sin of entropy doesn't exist.
Imagine measuring humans by using a unit of account that doesn't change like gold. From the eyes of an accountant, unemployed humans shouldn't exist. Due to their tendency to increase entropy, they are defective by birth.
Modern fiat currency tries to solve this problem by having a changing unit of account. The currency becomes defective to account for the defective humans.
But as I said, if your benchmark were a negative interest rate, then the fact that money represents a pristine slice of human time would not result into an original sin because the amount of pristine human time shrinks over time, to represent aging and your limited lifespan. Humans would no longer be defective. Every single human on this planet would be needed. You can even call them a blessing if you want.
However, there is no bias toward any specific population. You imply, more humans = better, which I disagree with. People should be allowed to decide how many humans they want on this planet.
