My CEO wants to open an office in a rural area an hour outside the city. I want to open the office closer to the city.
My argument is that even though the rent is higher we will be able to attract better talent. His argument is that the lower cost of living in the rural area will attract talent.
Neither of us is unbiased. I live in the city and the CEO lives in the rural town.
What is some objective data and / or articles we can review to help us make an informed non-emotional decision?
For context:
I'm the CTO and most of the employees for the next year will report to me.
This is not the bay area.
If it were me, I would look for some articles on businesses that chose to locate in rural areas and thrived. Then look for articles about the type of business you want to create that thrived and pay close attention to anything they say about what factors were important to their success.
Silicon Valley started as a lovely area and Stanford decided to foster tech businesses there. I think there was a lotto farmland out there at the time, but you should double check that. Now, SFBA is so expensive that some people don't want to live and work there. A lot of talent is moving to places like Seattle and Austin because it is just too crazy in the Bay Area.
I had a class on economic geography. Specific businesses need access to specific things in order to succeed. You basically need to list what things the business has need of and pick a location that fulfills those criteria. Some things that might matter:
A nearby college.
Critical infrastructure, such as high speed internet.
Transit and shipping options pertinent to your needs.
Research facilities, chamber of commerce or other business support.
This needs to be a business decision. Either location may work, but you need to pick it based on needs of the business.