Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | throwaway849755's commentslogin

A comment above says they are using https://www.qdusa.com/products/ppms.html with the DC 4-wire option.

All my instincts would prefer they were using the AC 4-wire option, given any reason to question results, and/or issues with contact effects, etc.


Thanks! That's great information. We had to make our own, but it's good to see that there are decent off the shelf systems. I agree that contact resistance on these tiny samples has got to be a huge issue (can they use mercury?). However, what I've seen suggests that even the low frequency AC measurements are more complex due to capacitive coupling effects. However, narrow bandwidth lock=in should improve noise... the equipment still just claims 10u Ohm.


Fluorescent tubes FTW (also soon to be banned for this use):

https://www.bitchute.com/video/adBl9klR1E6g/


From 2008 there was How to Build a Person by John Pollock. I don't recall whether he included some putative "explainer" disciplined by other components.


Heh. Seems to be a common pattern in book titles. There are also How to Build A Brain[1] by Chris Eliasmith and How To Create A Mind[2] by Ray Kurzweil as well.

[1]: https://www.amazon.com/How-Build-Brain-Architecture-Architec...

[2]: https://www.amazon.com/How-Create-Mind-Thought-Revealed/dp/1...


I believe a more accurate term would be AI confabulation.

When one confabulates, one shamelessly inserts words which sound smooth and grammatical and potentially acceptable to a listener (and the speaker), but shamelessly with no hesitation or corrections to achieve actual truth.

I suspect there needs to be some layering on of reflection and inhibition to avoid this.


Yes, 100% agree. See <https://universeodon.com/@siderea/109883198218504351> for some thoughts. I think we're stuck with the term 'hallucination' in most usage, if for no other reason than cognitive sloth.


Good link. And perhaps to be even less misleading above, LLM Confabulation. As another comment says, not fixable within the LLM.


Both are anthropomorphizations, implying some kind of "thought" process which doesn't exist.

The generated text is wrong, false, inaccurate. I don't think we really need a jargon-y term for it.


Perhaps with both 'hallucination' and 'confabulation' there are suggestions of both thought and absence of thought. The former suggestions are likely anthropomorphic. Suggesting some seamless lack of thought might not be?


Random but just spent an unnecessary amount of time debating with a confabulator at the gym today.

At least the day wasn't all lost. Learnt a new word.


Is there any HN effect by which enough contrary early opinion here could increase the odds of eventual triumph?

On the chance that there is, I will do my part:

In mice.


No synthesis. Less critical current than YBCO. Lame.


oh god i understood this reference. we love you cmdrtaco



The naysayers say nay.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: