Seems like social login isn't working for me on OSX. Just downloaded Kiro, clicked the Google option, allowed the app, and then get redirected back to http://localhost:3128/oauth/callback with an error "Error: AuthSSOServer: missing state".
Thanks for the report! I'll keep an eye on it. So far we aren't seeing any other reported issues, so it's possible that a browser extension, or something else in your setup is messing with the SSO flow.
Redirect back to localhost:3128 is normal, that's where Kiro is watching for a callback, but the missing state is not normal. Something may have stripped the info out of the callback before it occurred, which is why I suspect an extension in your browser.
It is also not working for me, this opens http://localhost:3128/oauth/callback?code=... but on Kiro interface I see "There was an error signing you in. Please try again"
After you said that google login didn't work, since I had also used github login, I wanted to tell that github login had worked for me, but you beat me to it!
I think Auth can be a bit of mess, but yes Its still absolutely great that I can just login with github and it just works, I am trying out Kiro right as we speak!
You have your pricing model backwards IMO. If your target market are those who cannot afford healthcare are they in the position to pay monthly for the possibility of discounted service? I understand that when you run the numbers $10/mrr from 1000 customers vs 100 providers is more appealing, but if the system is worth using providers would be throwing money at you to acquire non-insured cash customers at a scaled rate.
How many customers are currently using the system? How many providers and services are available for the first few customers to search through? If there answer is none or close to none I'd think about making the service free to use until it is worth it for one side or the other (it should be providers) to start paying.
That's an interesting proposal: make it free for members and eventually build enough membership that providers are actively wanting to join the network for a monthly fee.
To be clear, I'm happy with any pricing model that accomplishes the goal of helping people who are stuck paying out of pocket for healthcare. But charging providers doesn't seem viable because providers seem quite un-motivated. In fact, Pocketero's biggest challenge right now is getting providers to reply to invites to join the network. Not because they are opposed - they are willing to join if we can speak to someone. Rather they are overwhelmed with customers. They don't reply to emails/faxes/voicemails, they only seem to join if you get them on the phone and walk them through it. Because they are so un-motivated, part of my pitch is "it costs you nothing" - hopefully leaving no possible objections to joining.
But you pose a good question: "those who cannot afford healthcare are they in the position to pay monthly"? I'm starting to think sponsorship is the most viable model - small businesses, churches, etc. paying for memberships en masse. I just added the sponsorship feature on Monday, and may soon pivot the homepage to focus on sponsors. What do you think about that model instead?
"Free to join" does not mean you have removed all friction from the process. There is time they have to spend thinking about it and probably discuss with other stakeholders. Inertia is the strongest force in the universe so you have to find what motivates them to join, not just what removes barriers. This is an important detail.
Welp. It worked on the school-issued Chromebooks and my friend's Macbook Air but not on iPads or iPhones, so guess I have to test it on more Apple stuff :/
1. I registered on my laptop, opened account verification email on my phone. Verification link says I'm verified, laptop say's I'm not even after logging out/in.
2. It says 5 alerts are free, but at 3 alerts I'm presented with a message stating I've reached my limit.
3. Last pass doesn't seem to like the email field on sign in. It won't autofill it :(
I'm hearing similar feedback from others on all three items - if you shoot me your email to m@pmalerts.com I'll upgrade + verify you manually while I troubleshoot. Thanks for confirming these, and sorry for the headache!
Coffee roaster here, at 350F the beans have turned yellow and barely started browning. 390F~ is around the point where most roasters would consider development of flavor to really take off (yeah yeah pre-development phase, I'm keeping it short) and beans will be done at various points after that depending on roast preference.
The smoke that the roaster produces towards the end of roast is no joke, and some has to get on the beans, but I'd say it is minimal enough to not be an issue as there should be plenty of air flowing through the roaster at that point.
If roasted improperly oils could seep out of the beans while in the roaster which burn as well and stick to the beans. I'd say that is more of an issue than the smoke or roasting too dark.
At the time of this comment the majority of other comments are all about how the page doesn't work. It is broken for me in Firefox, Chrome, and mobile safari. I don't understand how a page this broken makes it to the #13 slot of HN.
Perfect timing as I sat through a 'for the first time ever blockchain is changing the coffee world' presentation in a room full of poverty stricken farmers and coffee buyers.
Stereotypical sales guy telling these farmers how blockchain is going to make sure coffee is traceable from seed to cup and revolutionize the industry. Everything is immutable, no one in the world is using blockchain for coffee, we are the first and announcing it here today! (just don't google it)
I'm out of the loop on how blockchain would actually help or be truly immutable in a case like coffee. I doubt independent associations are running nodes to prevent data tampering for this private company, and the process from seed to cup has long periods of time between each step. At what point do you enter all the immutable data? If you enter it little by little how do you 100% guarantee the association is correct and you're not mixing up plants, bags of beans, who shipped it, or the 30 other blocks of data we quickly scrolled through?
I sat through a similar presentation that was just crops in general rather than coffee specific last year. At no point did they address why you would want to do that or why it's not possible with non-blockchain technology. Just like all of the other presentations.
The B2B was the first thing I wondered when clicking the site. Would be neat to say 'were off setting our footprint via wren' and a 'click here to view our carbon profile and who were donating to.'
