It's sort of telling that you refuse to put any effort into showing anyone you can at least put together a crappy implementation to demonstrate understanding and contribute back to the same knowledge space (beginner knowledge is knowledge) you wish to extract from.
The demand for the highest quality code for what is essentially begging is also not becoming. Even contributing a terrible implementation would tickle people's motivation button (so they can teach someone without building your entire project, show they are measurable better than someone, etc)
Don't let the haters fool you - they're the same guys who told dropbox that they didn't see the point of their services over sharing usb flash drives.
This is a good idea. Other people could abuse it but this is certainly not abuse, any more than it would be to just file a feature request as an issue on a project. Hope it comes through.
No one said you had to run your for-profit idea on whatever code you come up with. There is something to be said about someone who asks for something but isn't willing to put in the work personally (or only the work they want to do).
The demand for the highest quality code for what is essentially begging is also not becoming. Even contributing a terrible implementation would tickle people's motivation button (so they can teach someone without building your entire project, show they are measurable better than someone, etc)
"Beggars can't be choosers"