Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

It's an IRS rule. Otherwise, the contractor could argue they were an employee and sue for back benefits. I think Microsoft got burned by this.


Not an IRS Rule, but it is something bigger companies want to implement so they don't have to pay for benefits for the contractor. When googling it, most I come up with is that most big companies don't want to make it look like they are using temporary work in place of a permanent employ.

(I can't believe I'm linking a Yahoo! Answers post about it, but it's the best that I can find quickly: https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20070308162652A...)




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: