> Is there any loss less binding of XML to s expressions? I've never seen one. Y... | Hacker News

Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit

		lisper on May 8, 2015 \| parent \| context \| favorite \| on: Why Lisp? > Is there any loss less binding of XML to s expressions? I've never seen one. You haven't looked hard enough. Mappging XML to sexprs is trivial: <tag value=attr ...>content</tag> --> ((tag value attr ...) content)

CJefferson on May 8, 2015 [–]

True, but to be honest, that isn't really any more useful compact (well, it saves closing tags I suppose).

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact