Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

What about Colorado? Seems like a good place for agriculture. And they are getting more rain than California at this time.


> What about Colorado? Seems like a good place for agriculture.

Most of the parts of Colorado that are good for agriculture (e.g., not the Rockies) are already being used for agriculture. You can't really replace the area of California currently being used for agriculture with agriculture-suitable land in Colorado that isn't already being used for agriculture.


Does Colorado[1] really look like such a great place to grow crops? Particularly in the context of what we're talking about here, water availability, snowpack changes, etc. Also, Colorado via Drought Monitor[3].

Iowa[2] for comparison.

[1] https://www.google.com/maps/place/Colorado/@38.9252672,-105....

[2] https://www.google.com/maps/place/Iowa/@41.9383166,-93.38979...

[3] http://droughtmonitor.unl.edu/Home/StateDroughtMonitor.aspx?...


Ummm, because there is snow there and not in Salinas.


Right. But the snow there means that there's going to be water there...


Temperature (and, particularly for many crops, frequency and duration of freezes) is an important consideration in growing crops. Water is important, too, but its not the only consideration in agriculture.


But Minnesota is one of the top agriculture states and being up north, they have more severe winters.


> But Minnesota is one of the top agriculture states and being up north, they have more severe winters.

It also has a very different crop mix than California.


Yeah, Cali has oranges and berries and whatnot. Good luck trying to get those to grow in Mn year round without a diesel heater.




Consider applying for YC's Summer 2026 batch! Applications are open till May 4

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: