That's actually command substitution, not process substitution :) | Hacker News

Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit

		icebraining on March 11, 2015 \| parent \| context \| favorite \| on: The Mighty Named Pipe That's actually command substitution, not process substitution :)

a3n on March 11, 2015 | [–]

Thanks for the correction. The unix is large and I'm so very small.

hollerith on March 11, 2015 | [–]

And command substitution has nothing to do with pipes, named or unnamed.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact