Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Well, the same kind of contracts approach could be used to enforce a duck-typed set of behaviors:

  [:quacks], [:barks] => Maybe[:flies]
Some Rubyists get pedantic about duck typing. It's just a tool to design good systems, not an article of faith.


Yeah the contract here is a form of nominative type checking, it could just as well be structural.




Consider applying for YC's Winter 2026 batch! Applications are open till Nov 10

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: