No, of course not. Jump in feet first with all that you've got and to hell with common sense.
> It's completely possible to make a profit (with low risk) without resorting to HFT.
Yes it is. For a while at least.
> I'd recommend you read Quantitative Trading by EP Chan for a great overview of the basic methods and some example implementations.
Reading is always good, second that.
> Disclaimer: I've done exactly this successfully for >2yrs now.
I know gamblers that have been on winning streaks too. Unfortunately that's not how the story ends, especially not for novice gamblers.
It's nice you have found a way to consistently beat the market and I really hope that you're outperforming the lowly index funds but without more data 'successfully' is awfully un-specific.
I made some money in the stockmarket too, but I'm not going to dress is up as intelligence, I'd rather admit that it was dumb luck.
No, of course not. Jump in feet first with all that you've got and to hell with common sense.
> It's completely possible to make a profit (with low risk) without resorting to HFT.
Yes it is. For a while at least.
> I'd recommend you read Quantitative Trading by EP Chan for a great overview of the basic methods and some example implementations.
Reading is always good, second that.
> Disclaimer: I've done exactly this successfully for >2yrs now.
I know gamblers that have been on winning streaks too. Unfortunately that's not how the story ends, especially not for novice gamblers.
It's nice you have found a way to consistently beat the market and I really hope that you're outperforming the lowly index funds but without more data 'successfully' is awfully un-specific.
I made some money in the stockmarket too, but I'm not going to dress is up as intelligence, I'd rather admit that it was dumb luck.