Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

> The same probably goes for driving[1], this doesn't make cars any less robust.

I don't think I can imagine anything less robust than cars, in terms of the frequency and severity of operational failure. They're pretty much the deadliest thing we've ever invented that wasn't actually designed to kill people.

It's actually a good example of the point developer1 was making: cars and shell scripts are perfectly safe if operated by highly competent people, and only become (extremely) dangerous when operated by incompetents, but in practice most operators are incompetent, in denial, and refuse to learn from others' mistakes.




> I don't think I can imagine anything less robust than cars, in terms of the frequency and severity of operational failure.

Maybe US cars :P

> They're pretty much the deadliest thing we've ever invented that wasn't actually designed to kill people.

It's a box weighing 1-2 tons that travels at 100kmh+. Millions (billions?) of km are driven every year. There will be accidents for both good drivers and bad. This won't change.

> cars and shell scripts are perfectly safe if operated by highly competent people, and only become (extremely) dangerous when operated by incompetents, but in practice most operators are incompetent, in denial, and refuse to learn from others' mistakes.

That's simply untrue - both points. Highly competent drivers will have accidents. I highly doubt you feel extreme danger when you get behind the wheel/in a car. The way you phrase it, one expects millions of fatalities daily.




Consider applying for YC's Fall 2025 batch! Applications are open till Aug 4

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: