Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

NASA costs about as much as the Carried Interest tax loophole for hedge fund managers.



It's also a lot smaller than the 4.5 trillion sunk in quantitative easing.


Quantitative easing doesn't actually cost money. The fed buys securities with it and probably breaks even or makes a profit.


And proponents of both justify them as ways of making capital available to worth while endeavors. In my mind that rings true for one slightly more than the other.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: