> I said unwarranted. As in, not justified and not related to his recent anecdote.
[Sorry. I couldn't believe you intended the correct meaning of unwarranted and instead meant "unjustified" in an entirely different sense.]
As he pointed out, if tip4commit tried to do what it was doing with anything other than a crypto currency, it'd have to change its ways or be shut down rather quickly; either way, he'd not have to deal with the problems it presents.
That may not be the most central point to his anecdote, but it is certainly a "warranted" point in the discussion.
