> What I'm specifically talking about is any example that mentions concepts, but at least he is clear that concepts are only currently available in a branch of GCC.
The syntax for concepts seems pretty well set now, and Alex Stepanov (author of the STL, and worked with Bjarne on the new concept model), in his Amazon A9 lectures (available on YouTube) recommends you simply #define concept names to "typename" so they at least exist in your code as documentation.
The most important thing however is really to get people writing their generic code with a concious awareness of what their type requirements actually are, and then to document and specify them correctly, just like you'd rightly expect a function written in C99 to specify clearly what the pre and post conditions are... something the compiler can't help you with even today.
The syntax for concepts seems pretty well set now, and Alex Stepanov (author of the STL, and worked with Bjarne on the new concept model), in his Amazon A9 lectures (available on YouTube) recommends you simply #define concept names to "typename" so they at least exist in your code as documentation.
The most important thing however is really to get people writing their generic code with a concious awareness of what their type requirements actually are, and then to document and specify them correctly, just like you'd rightly expect a function written in C99 to specify clearly what the pre and post conditions are... something the compiler can't help you with even today.