Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin
Ask HN: Is (2013) necessary?
6 points by swanson on April 20, 2014 | hide | past | favorite | 4 comments
I appreciate when older articles are explicitly dated: Bored people quit (2011), Citizen Kubrick (2004)

But it's only 4 months into 2014, does an article from 2013 need to be explicitly called out? Do you find it helpful or hurtful?



HN front page tends to concern itself with recently published news. It's a fair point that something doesn't have to be just-printed to be relevant, but I personally visit the front page and new page to stay up-to-date with what's new, and I appreciate the indicator of something that's not.


I don't find it hurtful.


This particular article is called "why delphi wont die" so i would say what year it was is very relevant.(even if 4-12 months)


I don't see a problem. When I see an article that has stood the test of time, I am more likely to read it.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: