Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

No. That's serial construction. To work, the process must defensibly be:

    search -> [intelligence]

              probable cause -> search -> [evidence]
Think of parallel construction the way engineers think about clean-room reimplementations, for instance of the old Phoenix BIOS. The probable cause that authorizes the evidence search has to be de novo; LEO's can't search you simply because the NSA tipped them off.



Right, they pretend it's parallel when in fact it's serial. The first illegal search is what generates the lead, no matter what secret rationale they come up with.


The first search needn't be illegal. An example:

NSA surveillance of a smuggler in Mexico produces the name of Joe Schmoe in El Paso (for concreteness let's say the intercept is "Joe Schmoe will distribute our cocaine, as always"). The DEA gets tipped, Joe Schmoe's name goes up on a tack board and he's put under surveillance. A case may be built from there using classical police methods.




Join us for AI Startup School this June 16-17 in San Francisco!

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: