I've used Grunt for most projects in the last year, and just tried Gulp for my newest.
Gulp seems snappier overall to me for tasks that watch a source directory with coffeescript or sass files in it. Maybe it's grunt-watch vs gulp.watch().
I think Grunt touches the filesystem more than Gulp which could potentially be a bottleneck. The creator (IIRC) of Gulp made a slideshow[0] .
Here's an example Gruntfile[1] generated with Yeoman and generator-angular. And a Gulpfile[2] which does fewer things (no production build yet).
Gulp seems snappier overall to me for tasks that watch a source directory with coffeescript or sass files in it. Maybe it's grunt-watch vs gulp.watch().
I think Grunt touches the filesystem more than Gulp which could potentially be a bottleneck. The creator (IIRC) of Gulp made a slideshow[0] .
Here's an example Gruntfile[1] generated with Yeoman and generator-angular. And a Gulpfile[2] which does fewer things (no production build yet).
[0]: http://slid.es/contra/gulp
[1]: https://github.com/jjt/dramsy/blob/master/client/Gruntfile.j...
[2]: https://github.com/jjt/LUXTRUBUK/blob/master/gulpfile.js