Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin
Review My App: Zen
36 points by nkohari on July 7, 2009 | hide | past | favorite | 38 comments
We just launched Zen, a lightweight, web-based project management tool geared towards startups and small teams that are interested in adopting a lean mindset. We've been in private beta for awhile now, but just opened to the public this morning.

Check it out and let us know what you think! I'm interested in any and all feedback.

http://agilezen.com/?r=hn



Using the phrase "crush the competition" seems to go against the rest of your site - calling the product "Zen," the bonsai tree, and the logo. At the least, it's a jarring contrast that distracts me from your product.


Pretty sure the contrast is on purpose, for humorous effect. It's just not very funny.


I actually thought it was great copy. It communicates the benefits of the product, then makes it more likable and memorable.

I also thought it was funny.


Actually I never thought of it that way. :)


Agreed; I would definitely get rid of that part. Zen isn't so much about crushing others. I feel like it should be a requirement to study a philosophy before using it to promote a product.

Edit: Signed up; looked around; certainly appears to be a solid product. I kinda like the story-board style stuff. Good luck! :)


While the concept of the brand is definitely a reference to Zen Buddhism, the name actually comes from the japanese word "kaizen" -- which is used in lean processes to mean "continuous improvement".

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kaizen


You might want to make that explicit in the copy.


See the last paragraph, here: http://agilezen.com/features/supports-lean


Some full size screenshots would be good to have on the Tour page rather than the current lengthy text descriptions. After skimming through the whole tour, I still don't have a sense of whether or not your app is better than Basecamp.


I completely agree with this, that's the first thing I thought. I immediately search for a sample site or demo account that's a lot quicker for me than reading all that text. Or if not a demo at least a concise screencast.


Of course it's better! :D Kidding. Yeah, actually, we launched the marketing site almost a month ago to build buzz before the launch, and since parts of the application weren't finished, the screenshots are outdated. I need to take the shots again and sprinkle them around the site.


Your "Company" page sends mixed signals. On one hand, you've obviously poured your hearts and souls into this, a big plus. OTOH, a husband and wife appearing as "President & Chief Technical Officer" and "Director of Operations" just seems a little weird to me.

This page could work for a team of 4 or 5 people with impressive backgrounds and interchangable skills, but it just shows your underwear. What if something happens to him? What if something happens to her? What if something happens to "them"?

In a strange way, the Company page is a lot like a butcher shop. We all know that, on the internet, a small company can look like a big company, but we really don't want to see what goes on behind the scenes.

Is there some way you can display your strengths on this page without revealing your weaknesses?


Small recommendation - add a home link at the top navigation bar when you are at sub pages. Helps people go back to the home page if necessary.


Well you can click the logo on the right to get back home. But I agree; I reflexively looked at the top left for their logo.


On the landing page the headers don't actually say much – the real lines are underneath, which I didn't read while skimming. Instead of:

"Enhances visibility and communication" -> "Make it easy to understand the status of your project at a glance"

"Simple and flexible" doesn't really have any meat in it. See Kawasaki's opposite rule – your competition doesn't describe their product as "Complicated and rigid."

"Easy to get started" -> "Get started in seconds"

Specific claims add a lot more punch and right now they're ousted from prominent positioning by phrases that don't say much.


See Kawasaki's opposite rule

Do you have a reference for this? As of this writing, the first Google hit for "Kawasaki's opposite rule" is the parent comment. :-)


Sorry, "opposite test" was the google-able phrase.

"Apply the opposite test. How many times have you read a product description like this? “Our software is scalable, secure, easy-to-use, and fast?” Companies use these adjectives as if no other company claims its product is scalable, secure, easy-to-use, and fast. See if your competition uses the antonyms of the adjectives that you use to describe your product. If it doesn't, your description is useless. For example, I've never seen a company say that its product was limited, full of leaks, hard-to-use, and slow."

http://blog.guykawasaki.com/2006/01/the_art_of_bran.html


Thanks!


All very good points. I'll take another look at our features page to see if we can improve.


Clickable link: http://agilezen.com/


Link that nkohari would probably rather you click:

http://agilezen.com/?r=hn


You should combine your JavaScript.

Also, the querystring timestamps break caching in some proxies. It's a bit of a pain, but it's best to integrate the timestamp into the filename.


Yeah, there are definitely opportunities for performance tweaks. I left it as-is until I can integrate it into our build process.


The UI is really clean, and the workflow seems pretty straighforward. Great job!

The "Add Story" sidebar doesn't render properly for me when hints are enabled (FF 3.5, Windows 7). The submit button is hidden behind the hint bar -- maybe the sidebar could be shorter so it's not covered by the hint.


Thanks... and yeah, several others have said that as well. The hint panel was meant to be an overlay, but it does tend to get in the way. I'll have to tweak it. :)


What is Kanban? Was that the original name? I ask because it's on all of your page titles.


Kanban just means "visual card" or "sign", but it's a name for a technique used in lean software practices. (Specifically, the board display in Zen is called a "kanban board".) It comes from the JIT inventory system of the Toyota Production System.

More info: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kanban http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lean_software_development


Signed up for a free account: the hint display blocks the bottom part of the add-story sidebar, which makes things more difficult to work with.

A way to get hints back after hiding them would be useful, too. Or some sort of way to summon contextual help. After hiding the hint to get it out of my way, I found I didn’t know what “Size” meant, and wasn’t immediately sure of where to look.

By the way, I’m currently using pivotal tracker (which has the nice advantage of being free, for some reason), so that’s my baseline for comparison.

Minor annoyance: the names next to the « or » should be clickable also, the «» are too small as click targets, so dismissing a sidebar requires more care than it should.

Pivotal gives you an ability to assign FPs to estimate stories, while Zen strongly encourages that you try to make your stories equally sized. I think I like your approach better, since I know I tend to avoid large stories — I need to break it down first before I can work on it without being frightened of it.

There seems to be a bug with trying to edit a story owner while the backlog is open (maybe applies to other sidebars as well, didn’t check). When I click the name, it disappears, then if I close the sidebar, the form shows up. If I click on multiple stories while the bar is open, I only get the form on one of them, and have to refresh the page to see the owners again. This is in Safari 4, didn’t check other browsers.

It would be nice if stories could be left unassigned in the backlog (perhaps this is meant to be possible, but is buggy? I can’t tell due to bug in above paragraph). Actually, I’d be happiest if stories added to the backlog defaulted to unassigned.

It took me too long to figure out how to reach the focus view, since you have to hover over the # (which I didn’t realize was clickable), and it is small. Feels like there should be an easier way, though I don’t have a suggestion at the moment.

Focus view of a story seems less-nice than the rest of the app. Too cluttered. Oh wait, if I hide the hint, it looks much nicer. I want to be able to widen the sidebar in focus view to have the values line up with the headings, making it shorter to get rid of the scrollbar I have there at my current window height (just a little bit too short).

------

Above was comments while I was playing with the app, hopefully it’s organized enough, because I’m too lazy to go back and review.

I think I like your approach more than Pivotal Tracker. Cleaner, and more pleasant, although you need to work really hard to address each and every interface quirk (a couple of which I mentioned above), since the primary appeal of your app is that it has a clean and fluid interface.

Customizable process (without a cluttered interface to manage it!) is a win. The way it is setup should help discourage people from having too many steps in the process, as well, since then the board would become unusable.

My 2 main sticking points:

1. Pivotal is free (again, I have no idea why. They should be taking my money right now)

2. I am unsure about the lack of time estimation (Pivotal provides, I think, the best method I’ve seen of time estimates, if you’re going to have them). Maybe it’s better to not have? I’m not sure.

Anyway, I have a project I’m just starting, with 1 other person. Will have to see if Zen tempts me enough to pay the $9 I’d need ;)

Some closing random thoughts:

1. Put a mini version of your logo to the left of Features (without moving Features to the right) in the nav bar, on every page except the home page. Or something along those lines. We really do look in the top-left to get back to the home page.

2. … just the 1 thought I guess. I had another, but I lost it.


Found and reported a bug on the work tab. Also, what is the purpose of the sizing field? Can I do anything with that or is it just a generic label for my own uses?


Yeah, several people have mentioned the bug. I'm working to fix it now, although I probably won't push again until after EOB today. The size field is free-form... most people use it either with "t-shirt sizing" (small, medium, large) or just put a numeric value in. Eventually it will be used in performance metrics, so you can see your cycle time for "large" stories, for example.


Awesome thanks! Also, if I mark a task as blocked and then throw it in the backlog the task is no longer red.

Am I just doing it wrong or is this a bug?


That's actually as-designed. If you block a story, it means you can't move it... so if you move it, the app figures you fixed what was wrong. :)


Also, if you type in the blocked description and then click in that same description field it erases your text. :( I lost stuff. It's best for me if it just highlighted all text. I'm using Chrome.


ohhh ok. Good to know thanks!


I would love the ability to designate parent/child relationships between stories.


how is this different from basecamp?


can't get to it


Where's your feature list? I want to know if there's to-do, task assignment, email notification, time tracking, and a Wiki. :)

I would cut down with the japanese/zen "motif." This isn't a Las vegas casino, it's a web app. I don't want the joy of slowly unraveling your Internet Mystery, I want an obvious and functional and minimalist (zen!) application that Gets Things Done.

I like your color scheme




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: