Academic science somehow manages to police itself fairly well with peer review processes. Wouldn't this type of paradigm work better than paying for the FDA to go through its approval process?
The FDA could still take action if they see that a company is doing something & claiming something that is not properly peer-reviewed and proven.
But why create extra red tape for everyone from the get-go?
The FDA could still take action if they see that a company is doing something & claiming something that is not properly peer-reviewed and proven.
But why create extra red tape for everyone from the get-go?