> Is due process the wrong term? Can't due process occur after the fact?
I think due process would be limited to simply removing the DNS entry, not resolving to a site that is promoting other commercial sites. Just think if coke accused pepsi and got pepsi.com to resolve to coke.com?
I think due process would be limited to simply removing the DNS entry, not resolving to a site that is promoting other commercial sites. Just think if coke accused pepsi and got pepsi.com to resolve to coke.com?