Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Given that the proposal describes dampers used to absorb change, I think this is wrong.

    By building a system on pylons, where the tube is not 
    rigidly fixed at any    point, you can dramatically    
    mitigateEarthquake risk and avoid the need for expansion  
    joints. Tucked away inside each pylon, you could place    
    two adjustable lateral (XY) dampers and one vertical (Z) 
    damper.
    
    These would absorb the small length changes between
    pylons due to thermal changes, as well as long form
    subtle height changes
(see page 11)


See section 4.2.3.

The tube will be supported by pillars which constrain the tube in the vertical direction but allow longitudinal slip for thermal expansion as well as dampened lateral slip to reduce the risk posed by earthquake.


It says dampers absorb change. But it doesn't mean only dampers do that. Of course they couldn't handle hundred meters expansion (near ends). I don't believe Musk would make such an easy mistake and force dampers handle all of thermal expansion.

That said, the quoted text is somewhat confusing. I had to read it a few times before I got the idea.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: