>I don't want to get into a flame war, but Haskell hasn't passed a certain threshold for it to be even considered for the problem of "exploding code base size".
What threshold?
>It is well done but it also causes a lot of well-known problems.
Like what? And why do you assume those problems are inherent to having types?
What threshold?
>It is well done but it also causes a lot of well-known problems.
Like what? And why do you assume those problems are inherent to having types?