The title is a perfectly accurate representation of the government's argument, which is that the Court's authority on this matter is limited to recognizing that the substantive questions raised are not ones subject to adjudication and dismissing the entire matter on that baisis without reaching the substance of the claims.
The fact that such arguments are within he range of common legal arguments does not make a title accurately reflecting them "awful".
Can you cite that from the article? Because I don't see that anywhere. What I see is:
> ... the alleged metadata program is fully consistent with the Fourth Amendment ... Because the Fourth Amendment is not breached, it follows that the First Amendment is not violated either
Which asks for a summary dismissal. The referenced article never suggests that the court lacks authority, at least not that I can read.
The fact that such arguments are within he range of common legal arguments does not make a title accurately reflecting them "awful".