Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Every device can have it's own address, so you don't really need it as much.


Sure, but if the ISPs number-one goal is putting a stranglehold on your personal freedoms, is there anything actually stopping them from using NAT on IPv6 if they wanted to?

If they are truly draconian cabals of evil, I don't expect "well, you don't need it as much" would stop them.


What's stopping them is their own greed; NAT costs more than not having it.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: