> It is said, conveniently enough mostly by software engineers, that building software is perhaps the most complex activity humans have ever undertaken.
Who says this? Because while I agree that some pieces of software are hugely complicated (writing a compiler, kernels, etc), I think it's massively overstating things to describe web development as the pinnacle of complexity. In fact I'd say it's a little insulting to doctors, physicists, engineers of equipment that get deployed into space, and so on.
I've read that phrase (or derivations of it) multiple times, like the "Programming is hard" phrase, but can't find a reference for you. I've updated the article to say "one of" to at least weaken the statement.
I agree that, while massive (multi MLOC) webapps can be very complicated, it's certainly no theoretical physics for instance.
Thank you for your time and feedback, have any more feedback?
It's a nice overview. I could see myself referring to a document like this as a convenient checklist when beta testing projects just prior to go-live.
If I was to find fault, it would be that the TL;DR section is a little redundant as in it's effort to be succinct (which the main body of the article achieves anyway), you end up dumbing the content down to a point where it's not actually expressing anything useful at all. But that's just my opinion and I may well have missed the point of the TL;DR. :)
Who says this? Because while I agree that some pieces of software are hugely complicated (writing a compiler, kernels, etc), I think it's massively overstating things to describe web development as the pinnacle of complexity. In fact I'd say it's a little insulting to doctors, physicists, engineers of equipment that get deployed into space, and so on.