Young coined that term 'meritocracy' in satire; I feel it remains a ridiculous concept.
Who judges what is meritorious? The entrenched majority? Won't they tend to think along similar lines and discount dissenting opinions as lacking merit?
I suggest that there is no meritocracy in existence to begin with.
Who judges what is meritorious? The entrenched majority? Won't they tend to think along similar lines and discount dissenting opinions as lacking merit?
I suggest that there is no meritocracy in existence to begin with.