I don't see why. Yes, it was done that way last time; but we currently prohibit substances at the national level, that has been upheld by the Supreme Court, and I don't see any reason at all that should work differently than for alcohol. If I'm missing something, please elucidate.
I was referring to other drugs, specifically cannabis.
This petition was in direct response to the DEA's recent refusal to remove it from Schedule I status. This keeps it in the same class of drugs as heroin and cocaine.
Yes, that was precisely my point: we are currently doing it for other substances, no reason I see we couldn't include alcohol. Plenty of reason we shouldn't, of course, but I think most people here agree those reasons apply to things we're currently banning, which is the thrust of the whole discussion.
Not necessarily. Read the 21st amendment. It mostly repeals the 18th and clarifies that laws can be made to regulate alcohol use. The petition is to control alcohol under the Controlled Substances Act.
Would it? The 21st amendment only repeals the 18th, it doesn't explicitly legalize alcohol (I'm no constitutional scholar so clarification is welcome.)
It did require an amendment (the 18th, as cited in the petition). It is the only amendment ever repealed.
It was an abject failure.
This is not about "letting people get loaded". That will always happen. This is about taking away what could be considered the primary tool of tyranny by the State. Now the War on Terror is edging it out for first place.