that just sounds like an accounting trick. if Mississipi had higher revenue it could accomodate for more social services without the help of California.
i'm not very familiar with this stuff, but i believe states like California have better social safety nets than states like Mississipi. so different states don't even actually start from the same place
i'm not very familiar with this stuff, but i believe states like California have better social safety nets than states like Mississipi. so different states don't even actually start from the same place