It depends what your definition of SF is. If you are talking relative to the incredibly expensive north-eastern part of San Francisco, I agree. But Daly City, etc. aren't that much cheaper than the Sunset/Richmond/Excelsior, especially when you consider that a car will become much more necessary.
That said, SF is more of a place to live if you don't have children (and if you have children, you better be rich). Those with kids tend to live in the suburbs.
That said, SF is more of a place to live if you don't have children (and if you have children, you better be rich). Those with kids tend to live in the suburbs.