So this is basically a he-says-she-says situation where:
* Tor blames X for withdrawing all the money
* X claims he has no idea where the money went and suspects Tor was the one who stole it
The father and director of board in this case has a very high position in the government. This is why X did not pursue this legally, due to the publicity and stuff. It is also very unlikely that he would risk his position to cover up that his son stole ($25k-$75k, unsure of the actual amount).