except 99% of AI—written content is spam. If the article was an ad for some company and also made no sense, would you hate on the guy who commented "this is an ad"?
Because that's not what happened? What? Neither smartmic's root-level comment or rdsubhas's response mention it being an ad. I was criticising adhamsalama's dismissal of rdsubhas's comment as AI, who also said nothing about it being an ad. I'm so baffled. Can you not see the structure or the content of this thread?
