Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

You're only saying that because it's a witch-hunt. These sorts of oversights are routinely made and forgiven daily at all levels of society. Citi regularly sends millions of dollars to wrong accounts and then says "my bad, give it back" and no one bats an eye.

But some ai gen'd placeholders beak through and suddenly we're all about punishing an oversight?

That's the definition of a witch hunt, and it's past time we admit it.



It's literally not the definition of a witch hunt. They weren't hunting for AI use in E33 or other nominees. Sandfall was stripped of the award because it admitted to using AI after the fact, despite pledging that no AI tools had been used *at any point of the development process.

Sandfall opened themselves up to this when they accepted the nomination knowing the rules for this particular award prohibited AI use of any kind.

Note that there is also now a discussion about how much AI was used to design the enemies as well, given the rather bizarre appearances of many of them enemies in the latter portions of the game.


> That's the definition of a witch hunt

You gave examples of a witch hunt. Not definition.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: