And even if you somehow included "everything" with the "perfect" equations, you'll end up with a lot of stuff which does not have a good closed form solution anyways and good luck getting that running (e.g. the dynamics around the air resistance/sound generation) via approximations both accurate enough that it looks better than "faking it" and fast enough that it's actually usable interactively.
This leads to what GP was saying: many just cut things off at "Hooke's law simulates a spring, so I'll use that, but the rest is a bit too much to fit so I won't do it" but "Hooke's law simulates a spring but adding a bit of not-physics based fluff approximates all the rest" actually gives far superior results even though it doesn't only use perfect physics equations as the former did.
This leads to what GP was saying: many just cut things off at "Hooke's law simulates a spring, so I'll use that, but the rest is a bit too much to fit so I won't do it" but "Hooke's law simulates a spring but adding a bit of not-physics based fluff approximates all the rest" actually gives far superior results even though it doesn't only use perfect physics equations as the former did.