Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

The problem is that the Web has turned into ChromeOS Platform, the only reason it hasn't yet is iDevices and Safari.

Also Web apps are basically the 21st century version of timesharing like in the good old days, where we had one server for everyone.

Even better for censorship purposes.





In almost all cases, phone apps talk to that same central server as the web browser, just with a different (much worse) client that you have less control over.

If it were the case that phone apps weren't networked and could only sync through another channel like icloud/syncthing, then you'd be onto something.

But right now most apps are "web browser but worse".


Native apps might need networking, Web apps require networking, they might simulate offline to various degrees depending on local storage, which they don't have any control over, and is shared.

  Web apps require networking
PWA (installable apps, without the store) would like to differ.

But now we're getting into the crux of it.

What you want is a better (and easier to use) sandbox for native apps, so that users can feel as comfortable installing an app as visiting a web page as long as the app doesn't have any more permissions than the web page would have, and then you don't need central gatekeepers approving them.


No, because a native app still lacks features like a dev toolbar, extensions, url deep-navigation, observability, and cross-platform availability.

Web tech is much closer to where I want than the native app stack on every device reaching parity which will never happen.


First of all, there is hardly a place to get them, second they are so good that everyone ends up shipping Chrome alongside the app.

The platform that software is delivered through is independent of whether it works offline.

You mean the ISPs, whose permits are controlled by goverment authorities?

Easier to threaten one Store rather than 10,000 ISP's.

Also easier to install a VPN than to replace your phone with one that isn't controlled by Apple or Google.

As long as it isn't a criminal offence to do so.

Probably still still easier even if it was.

I am sure there is enough law enforcement units to take care of it.

Might be trouble for the ones outside your jurisdiction.

> 10,000 ISP's.

Lol, you must be from the 90s. There's like 10 now.


Just because the US has consolidated many ISP's doesn't mean the rest of the world has. Also, even in the US, that figure is just under 2k. Globally, it is >16k.



Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: