Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

>Businesses run on VPNs. Every company with remote employees uses VPNs. Every business traveler connecting through sketchy hotel Wi-Fi needs one. Companies use VPNs to protect client and employee data, secure internal communications, and prevent cyberattacks.

Oh look, someone's conflating business VPNs and consumer VPNs again. This time to legitimize consumer VPNs.

The cited laws propose to ban pornography for minors, and ban VPNs that hide geolocation and their use in accessing pornography. Nothing to do with businesses using private VPNs to encrypt employee traffic.

>Vulnerable people rely on VPNs for safety. Domestic abuse survivors use VPNs to hide their location from their abusers.

Woah, maybe VPNs have some uses I haven't considered, let's take a look at the linked article.

>Use a virtual private network (VPN) to remain anonymous while browsing the internet, signing a new lease or applying for a new home loan. This will also keep your location anonymous from anyone who has gained access to or infiltrated your device.

I think the loan thing is rubbish I don't get it, and it's unaffected by the law. But the idea of installing a VPN in case the device is compromised might make sense, if the device is compromised it might still be trackable, especially while downloading the VPN, but maybe if it connects at startup, and the RAT isn't configured to bypass the VPN bridge, it might work.

Quite a stretch if you ask me. And again, not relevant to adult sites blocking VPNs.

The rest of the example are the usual "people use it to evade the government and regulations but it can be THE BAD GOVERNMENt AND REGULAtiONS"



The only way to block a VPN is to have the knowledge that certain IPs are used by VPN providers. It's pretty trivial for someone to run a script/app that spins up a server somewhere, installs VPN software on it, and uses that for the connection. Now there's no way to separate whether a user is connecting via a VPN or not.


It's pretty trivial for you or I. The average 12 year old who this law aims to protect doesn't know how to do that.


I wouldn't underestimate 12 year olds. It's not hard to find an online community (chatroom/message board) where other members post this stuff.

It's also pretty trivial to wrap in an app

Source, I was setting up home proxies so classmates could access Flash games on school computers when I was 12...


Never underestimate the work ethic of a 12 year old who wants to look at porn.


You’re right, because laws against underage drinking and drug use have really been affective over the years. It only takes one smart 12 year old to show everyone else how to do it. Heck if I were 12 now with 1TB u/d internet connection, I’m sure I would have set some type of proxy up for my friends.

If I could figure out 65C02 assembly programming at 12 in the 80s without the Internet and some books, I’m sure the 12 year old me in 2025 could set up a proxy.


At 11 years old, I was dialing into BBS' to download images I'd print for my friends.

Kids are resourceful.


I think you misunderstand the comment you are replying to, it's talking about the perspective of the sysadmin of the adult website, and how it would detect a VPN user.


Is this related to my comment at all? I do have another comment about the technical feasibility of this ban though.


It is.

> Quite a stretch if you ask me. And again, not relevant to adult sites blocking VPNs.

With the workaround I outlined, adult sites can no longer be aware of all VPNs in order to block them, if things do get that far. And you can be sure the ones the measure is supposed to "protect" will gain access to scripts/apps for said workaround.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: