Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

"Yeah but the problem here is that the FSF has this annoying track record of being proven correct, over and over again"

It's not that FSF is proven correct, it's that the FSF disapproves of 99.9% of software, it's easy for them to look back when there's a scandal and say "see? we told you so.". Too many false positives.



That doesn't actually mean that they're not correct.


too many false positives means you should reconsider what you call a false positive




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: