Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

If you spend effort being local-first, you can’t spend that on features or UX.

You have a disadvantage vs. competitors who focus solely on the latter.



Is local-first local-only actually harder to build and secure than a four-nines uptime service?

I understand that it's less profitable, which is the real reason nobody does it.


Building and securing local first is definitely harder than four-nines.

Want 99.99% uptime? Easy.

Cloudflare, AWS, fly.io, Vercel etc. have poured decades of person-years of engineering into platform reliability and operational excellence so you can get it with a few quick CLI commands.


Just because the infra you built on top of is 99.99% uptime doesn't mean that your application is.




Consider applying for YC's Summer 2026 batch! Applications are open till May 4

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: