It was reading step 2 and he was trying to get it to do step 1.

He had not yet combined the ingredients. The way he kept repeating his phrasing it seems likely that “what do we do first” was a hardcoded cheat phrase to get it to say a specific line. Which it got wrong.

Probably for a dumb config reason tbh.

> I’m mostly confused why the guy interrupted what sounded like a valid response

I thought they were demonstrating interruption handling.

Because it was repeating what it had already described rather than moving on to the first step

I think he was just trying to get it back on track instead of letting it go on about something that was completely off