The paper and its author is completely irrelevant. It was only required to convey an idea, and that idea has been understood, refined and elaborated much further since then.
Bitcoin "is what it is".
i assume they're referring to "satoshi" that cryptos creator who seemed to want to separate money and its control from government?
I wouldn't call him a prophet nor even agree with his views on money, but as the creator of that particular crypto his likely opinion on this would seem relevant
> who seemed to want to separate money and its control from government? ... I wouldn't call him a prophet nor even agree with his views on money,
I wouldn't agree either, and that, together with the sheer impossibility of asking him about important aspects of his views is enough to render him irrelevant.
If he wanted to be relevant, he'd be here answering questions...
I was not talking about your jokes but about the person you implicitly referenced and his ideas, that's clear from my comments.
You are right about joking however - given that person's short appearance as an anonymous actor with who knows what conflicts of interest, the only sane thing to do is joke about him and his ideas.
“What is needed is an electronic payment system dependent on support and adoption of centralized governments and banks."