> Instead, you want to use the format that can be read and written by a rank novice with a single programming course under their belt, because that's what makes the field approachable by dewey-eyed undergrads eager to get their feet wet. Giving those folks an easy on-ramp is how you grow the field.

This is good, but you're implicitly saying there's a tradeoff made to achieve this, because otherwise we wouldn't be talking about alternatives. And an on-ramp for novices is good, but I don't see a step where the standards of the field move on from what novices can handle.