> i doubt, rust has a lot of tooling and catches at compile time what their product does in runtime.

You're making the claim that Antithesis isn't necessary because compile time type-checking solves problems that Antithesis is targeting. That's strictly not true; the kinds of bugs that Antithesis is targeting are not solved via type checking and has never been something Rust has targeted at solving, through ecosystem or otherwise. See my example about trying to implement a distributed consensus algorithm.

> You're making the claim that Antithesis isn't necessary because compile time type-checking solves problems that Antithesis is targeting

sorry, i never claimed what you stated above.

you have taken only part of my initial statement and made total nonsense of it by stating it is the only one thing i said.

i said:

1. rust needs antithesis less of others

2. rust has equivalent tooling for free

3. biz practices of antithesis will harm its adoption, in rust eco

Can you point to any of Rust's supposed "equivalent tooling"?