Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

MIT license - very nice!


The application of known FOSS licenses to what is effectively a binary-only release is misleading and borderline meaningless.


It is an unfortunate recycling of an existing regime that no doubt offends Stallman to his very core, but I wouldn't call it meaningless.

If you're in a company and need a model which one do you think you're getting past compliance & legal - the one that says MIT or the one that says "non-commercial use only"?


what does that mean in this context? it seems to depend on an LLM. so can i run this completely offline? if i have to sign up and pay for an LLM to make it work, then it's not really more useful than any other non-free system


Microsoft is cool




Consider applying for YC's Winter 2026 batch! Applications are open till Nov 10

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: