This issue raises one of those odd dynamics where people concerned with the welfare of humanity brush against the people arguing for the longevity of public infrastructure. And against them both are the string-pulling hands who have an advantage if either interest prevails.

Or maybe it’s not that odd and this is a common conflict.

I stand on the side of those indifferent to the material consequences of this censorship on pure moral grounds.

And the funny thing is that there are people who seek to mean well and who find the material trade-off intolerable for their own reasons.

Society as a whole is kept in quite the quagmire by the string of these aforementioned hands, ain’t they?