Look at the biggest products of the areas around Washington DC. You'll find coal, more coal, and "things we found while mining coal"

Solar and wind projects are not a panacea. They consume minerals and fossil fuels at a rate that the church of climatology never discuss, and actively surpress.

So does every source of energy. No one claims they're a panacea. They obviously do reduce use of fossil fuels overall though, and are cheaper.

Did renewable energy hurt you as a child or something?

I know they're removing subsidies for solar and wind, but are they going beyond that? Leveling the playing field (and finally admitting that intermittent sources require batteries in order to be compared to true base load alternatives) seems like a rational thing to do.