I noticed that . Typically after the first post hits the front page and goes viral, someone else will submit a second post, which also hits the front page. It's rare, but I have seen it happen a few times over the years.
Humpty Dumpty sat on a wall.
Humpty Dumpty had a great fall.
All the king's horses and all the king's men
Couldn't put Humpty together again.
Now with openAI costing you but a feather
you can put Humpty back together!
TWENTY thousand a month? Surely this is wrong. Even $2k is ridiculous, but that's just criminal. Honestly, at a certain point, you might consider learning organic chemistry just to synthesize it yourself. It's fairly easy using unwatched precursors.
This is how it is in the US for uncommon disorders, but the amount paid out of pocket is often vastly less. People are typically not writing huge checks for these drugs. It's still daunting though. The pharma company charges a lot to recoup the cost of developing and marketing the drug, which is typically paid by Medicaid. The economics wouldn't make it worthwhile develop the drug if it were too cheap.
I don't know the parent story at all, but generally drug companies are allowed to charge $$$$ for certain drugs that are affective for rare conditions, on the basis that it won't be patients who pay for them. Rather payment will ultimately come from government, possibly via an insurer. The idea being that the drugs get made and brought to market when otherwise they would not, because nobody can afford a $20K drug.
You say that like caring about the situation I find myself and my son in, not liking it, and sharing that frustrating reality with others is a bad thing.
Please don't reply to a bad comment with an even worse comment. That's the epitome of inflammatory behavior. It's not what this site is for, and destroys what it is for.
I apologize. I think if you review my comment history, it is apparent that I follow the guidelines, mostly. I flagged the comment, but I felt particularly inflamed in the moment. Personally, I feel the comments are of equal quality.
I appreciate the apology but not the equivocation. Addressing someone like that is never ok and means you surrender the right to criticize someone else. If we want others to be better we need to hold ourselves to a high standard first.
I've only seen this now, three days later. Sorry you felt unfairly attacked by my comment. It just seemed you were doubling down on the view that your comment being equivalent to the one you were replying to, which, is just not how we want to think about things (comment should be evaluated in their own right).
Maybe I was too harsh. We had a quite a lot of politics-related flamewar last week, which always makes the job less enjoyable, most-of-all when users take out their political anger on us.
Sorry if I seemed to lack empathy. I did appreciate the apology and I hope you'll keep using HN and making an effort to contribute positively. And thanks for sharing your feelings about my comment, it's helpful to know, so I can better calibrate in future.
In this week’s newsletter, I want to give you some personal insight from my own experiences that I think will help explain where true personal satisfaction comes from—it comes from many places, not just one—and how you create it every day, win or lose, by the way you show up in each part of your life.
My friend loves to use em dashes, not hyphens "-" but em dashes "—". He can no longer use them since people would suspect his writing was AI generated otherwise...
The AI learned by reading writing. It's ultimately only as good as the data put in.
I also write using dashes like this. It seems to mimic speech more naturally to me - it seems intuitive. I'm also somewhat on the spectrum and I find myself (and apparently many others) more often than not trying to mimic social and language cues.
