Again, where it comes from is an important part of this. You are cherry picking the most extreme example you can think of while using a word specifically implying genetic inferiority.
You are using that term when talking about an issue that disproportionately targets marginalized groups and victims of traumatic assault.
There is one very specific, well known group in history who would take your side on this issue and use the same terminology. You know who they are.
No, I am using the word as defined in the dictionary. Take your pearl clutching eugenics tosh somewhere else.
A video game whose purpose is to take enjoyment (and let's be hoenst, sexual gratification) from rape and sexual assault media is morally reprehensible.
> You are using that term when talking about an issue that disproportionately targets marginalized groups and victims of traumatic assault.
No, I am talking about people who enjoy rape media.
If you are saying this is in effect targeting marginalized groups then you are saying these groups enjoy rape media at a higher rate to the wider public. I am sure that's not what you're trying to say, but that's how the argument is sounding from reasonable people who think games that promote rape should be banned.
Stop hiding disgusting behaviour behind "marginalized groups". It won't do anything good for them.
You are using that term when talking about an issue that disproportionately targets marginalized groups and victims of traumatic assault.
There is one very specific, well known group in history who would take your side on this issue and use the same terminology. You know who they are.